by Sanket
Borgaonkar, MD, and Yochai Birnbaum, MD, FACC
A 59-year-old woman with hypertension,
hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux reported exertional angina that
resolved with rest and nitroglycerin. Nuclear stress test results revealed a
small, reversible inferior-wall defect and a left ventricular ejection fraction
(LVEF) of 0.67. A coronary angiogram showed diffuse 3-vessel disease. The
patient underwent elective 4-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with
no complications and was extubated the next day. On postoperative day 2, a
routine electrocardiogram (ECG) showed an rSr′ pattern in leads V1 and
V2, and ST-segment elevation (STE) in leads V2 through V4
(Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 |
The patient reported no chest pain or dyspnea and had no murmurs, gallops, or rubs. A bedside echocardiogram showed preserved LVEF and no wall-motion abnormalities. Her initial troponin I level of 29.74 ng/mL decreased to 19.05 ng/mL 12 hours later.
The ECG
shows which of the following?
A) Brugada
phenocopy
B) Brugada
type 2 pattern
C) Pericarditis
D) Acute
anterior STE myocardial infarction (STEMI)
Answer
C) Pericarditis
The ECG shows concave STE in leads V2
through V4, and mild reciprocal ST-segment depression and PR
elevation in lead aVR (Fig. 2), probably signifying postsurgical pericarditis.
Fig. 2 |
Brugada ECG patterns are classified as
type 1 (a coved STE pattern >2 mm in leads V1 through V3
followed by a negative T wave) and type 2 (a saddleback STE pattern >2 mm).1
Either pattern can be seen in patients with Brugada phenocopy, a phenomenon in which
a true congenital Brugada syndrome is not present. The diagnostic criteria for
Brugada phenocopy include the following2,3: a type 1 or 2 Brugada
pattern and a medical condition to explain it, resolution of that pattern when
the underlying condition resolves, no symptoms (such as syncope), no family history
suggesting Brugada syndrome, and negative provocative testing with a
sodium-channel blocker.
Although our patient had saddleback
STEs in lead V2, her clinical presentation was more consistent with
pericarditis. In addition, rSr′ patterns in Brugada type 2 indicate different
phenomena. Benign patterns, typically when the initial r wave is taller than r′,
occur in athletes, pectus excavatum, or partial right bundle branch block, and
after higher chest-lead placement of electrodes V1 and V2.
In pathologic rSr′ patterns (as in right ventricular enlargement or
arrhythmogenic dysplasia, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, or hyperkalemia), r′ tends
to be taller than r.4 Furthermore, the β angle (which the r′ wave
makes with the ST segment) can be used to diagnose type 2 Brugada syndrome by
measuring the duration of the base of the triangle of r′ at 5 mm from the high
takeoff. A β angle >3.5 mm suggests type 2 Brugada syndrome,1 and
our patient’s pattern did not meet this criterion.
Acute STEMI was excluded:
the patient was hemodynamically stable without chest pain and had preserved LVEF,
normal wall motion, and decreasing troponin I levels (their elevation was
probably secondary to recent CABG). Before her discharge from the hospital, the
ST changes in the anterior leads resolved (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3 |
References
- Bayes de Luna A, Brugada J, Baranchuk A, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G, Goldwasser D, et al. Current electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of Brugada pattern: a consensus report [published erratum appears in J Electrocardiol 2013;46(1):76]. J Electrocardiol 2012;45(5): 433-42.
- Perez-Riera AR, Barbosa-Barros R, Daminello-Raimundo R, de Abreu LC, Baranchuk A. Unusual ST-segment elevation in the anterolateral precordial leads: ischemia, Brugada phenocopy, Brugada syndrome, all, or none? Circulation 2017;136(20):1976-8.
- Ferrando-Castagnetto F, Garibaldi-Remunan A, Vignolo G, Ricca-Mallada R, Baranchuk A. Brugada phenocopy as a dynamic electrocardiographic pattern during acute anterior myocardial infarction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2016;21(4):425-8.
- Baranchuk A, Enriquez A, Garcia-Niebla J, Bayes-Genis A, Villuendas R, Bayes de Luna A. Differential diagnosis of rSr′ pattern in leads V1-V2. Comprehensive review and proposed algorithm. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2015;20(1):7-17.
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.